counterfeit
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
counterfeit [2022/05/21 00:28] – created mcmaster | counterfeit [2025/02/03 20:07] (current) – mcmaster | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Counterfeit research library | + | Counterfeit research library. This is focused on what the chip markings assert as opposed to what the seller asserts. For example, a buyer could be unhappy if they bought a new chip with ESD damage, but its more of a gray area vs a chip that has been remarked and has an incorrect die. |
+ | |||
+ | Counterfeit IC: a chip (ie marking) that misrepresents the product. This might include: | ||
+ | * Incorrect die | ||
+ | * Missing die | ||
+ | * Incorrect date | ||
+ | * Incorrect speed grade | ||
+ | |||
+ | These are also of interest but not the primary focus: | ||
+ | * Used vs new | ||
+ | * General EOS such as ESD damage | ||
+ | |||
+ | Sometimes a manufacturer will remark its own chips (ex: downgrading speed). However these are rare and less common in modern times. (TODO: find example) | ||
[[max232]] | [[max232]] | ||
[[usb_serial]] | [[usb_serial]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | i7-770K: https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | TODO: STM32 counterfeit site | ||
+ | |||
+ | I've heard Xilinx parts are one of the most profitable to counterfeit | ||
+ | |||
+ | https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | These: | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Commercial products ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | FTDI bricking scandal | ||
counterfeit.1653092922.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/05/21 00:28 by mcmaster