Silicon Pr0n

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace: • map_queue • type_memory • template • type_analog
mcmaster:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
mcmaster:start [2021/03/24 07:44] – mcmastermcmaster:start [2023/02/16 10:17] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 Images: Images:
-{{topic>collection_jm}} 
  
 {{topic>collection_mcmaster}} {{topic>collection_mcmaster}}
Line 48: Line 47:
     * Decapping involves harsh chemicals, direct expenses, high NRE, and time so contributions are greatly appreciated     * Decapping involves harsh chemicals, direct expenses, high NRE, and time so contributions are greatly appreciated
   * Any potential legal issues associated with the chip?   * Any potential legal issues associated with the chip?
-    * Ex: DRM, crypto+    * If so, it will be evaluated on a case by case basis 
 +    * Ex: DRM, crypto can be problematic
     * Ex: a typical sound chip or microcontroller is not an issue     * Ex: a typical sound chip or microcontroller is not an issue
 +    * I will not work on: satellite, cable TV
   * Clearly identify the chips, especially if you are sending more than one   * Clearly identify the chips, especially if you are sending more than one
     * Ex: specify "344S0061-A" instead of"SWIM", since that's what's printed on it     * Ex: specify "344S0061-A" instead of"SWIM", since that's what's printed on it
Line 72: Line 73:
 In general I want to focus on R&D / labwork and not hand digitization.  I do have some limited semi-automatic digitization capabilities for planarized chips though that I'd like to develop (ex: works on PS1 chipset). In general I want to focus on R&D / labwork and not hand digitization.  I do have some limited semi-automatic digitization capabilities for planarized chips though that I'd like to develop (ex: works on PS1 chipset).
  
-Most of this is targeted towards small chips up to the mid 90's.  If the die is obnoxiously large (ex: 486 CPU) it will be difficult for me to photograph and stitch the entire thing.  Similarly most of my equipment is targeted towards larger processes (say 180+nm), although I do have a small SEM if required. See [[https://siliconpr0n.org/map/xilinx/xc2c32a/lap4-04_mit20x/|XC2C32A]] for an example 180 nm chip taken with a relatively low power objective, noting in theory I can get about 11x the detail (NA 0.42 => 1.4).+Most of this is targeted towards small chips up to the mid 90's.  If the die is obnoxiously large (ex: 486 CPU) it will be difficult for me to photograph and stitch the entire thing.  Similarly most of my equipment is targeted towards larger processes (say 180+nm), although I do have a small SEM if required. See [[https://siliconpr0n.org/map/xilinx/xc2c32a/mcmaster_lap4-04_mit20x/|XC2C32A]] for an example 180 nm chip taken with a relatively low power objective, noting in theory I can get about 11x the detail (NA 0.42 => 1.4).
  
 Other: most of the work is in decapping, not actual imaging. If you happen to already have a bare, clean die and would be satisfied with a quick / lower quality scan, feel free to send me a few dies. This also can work out well since most of the NRE cost is in the microscope, not the decapping supplies. Other: most of the work is in decapping, not actual imaging. If you happen to already have a bare, clean die and would be satisfied with a quick / lower quality scan, feel free to send me a few dies. This also can work out well since most of the NRE cost is in the microscope, not the decapping supplies.
Line 84: Line 85:
   * mit20x: BH2 microscope, MU800 camera, 0.5x relay lens, Mitutoyo M Plan Apo lens   * mit20x: BH2 microscope, MU800 camera, 0.5x relay lens, Mitutoyo M Plan Apo lens
   * mit20x2: BH2 microscope, USB3 camera, 0.75x relay lens?, Mitutoyo M Plan Apo lens   * mit20x2: BH2 microscope, USB3 camera, 0.75x relay lens?, Mitutoyo M Plan Apo lens
 +    * Select medium resolution 2736 x 1824
 +    * 20x
 +      * 0.42 @ 800 nm => 952 nm R objective resolution
 +      * 0.42 @ 532 nm => 633 nm G objective resolution
 +      * 0.42 @ 400 nm => 476 nm B objective resolution
 +      * About 820 um wide field of view
 +      * 820 / 2736 = 300 nm / pix raw
 +        * Cut image by half to sample RGB correctly => 600 nm / pix
 +      * 820 / 2736 / 0.5 = 599 nm / pix ultimate image resolution
 +    * vc60x => 1.4 NA
 +      * 1.4 @ 400 nm => 143 nm objective resolution
 +      * About 820 / (60/20) => 273 um FOV
 +      * 273 um / 2736 pix / 0.5 pix/pix => 200 nm / pix ultimate image resolution
 +    * Conclusion: possibly losing slight resolution in blue, but probably good enough
  
 TODO: link github calibration files TODO: link github calibration files
  
-^ Scope      ^ Objective  ^ NA  ^ Resolving power (nm)  ^ nm / pix  ^ Notes               ^ +^ Scope      ^ Objective  ^ NA  ^ Resolving power (nm)  ^ Camera  ^ nm / pix  ^ Notes               ^ 
-| pr0nscope  | mit2x      |     | 5000                  | 3550      |                     | +| pr0nscope  | mit2x      |     | 5000                  | MU800   | 3550      |                     | 
-| pr0nscope  | mit5x      |     | 2000                  | 1420      |                     | +| pr0nscope  | mit5x      |     | 2000                  | MU800   | 1420      |                     | 
-| pr0nscope  | mit10x     |     | 1000                  | 710       |                     | +| pr0nscope  | mit10x     |     | 1000                  | MU800   | 710       |                     | 
-| pr0nscope  | mit20x     |     | 700                   | 355       |                     | +| pr0nscope  | mit20x     |     | 700                   | MU800   | 355       |                     | 
-| pr0nscope  | ns50xu     |     |                       | 142?      |                     | +|            | mit20x2    |     |                       | 20MP    |           | New camera setup    | 
-| pr0nscope  | nd50x      |     |                       | 142?      |                     | +| pr0nscope  | ns50xu     |     |                       | MU800   | 142?      |                     | 
-| pr0nscope  | mit50xn    |     | 700                   | 142       |                     | +| pr0nscope  | nd50x      |     |                       | MU800   | 142?      |                     | 
-| pr0nscope  | mit100x    |     | 400                   | 71        | FIXME: correct NA?  |+| pr0nscope  | mit50xn    |     | 700                   | MU800   | 142       |                     | 
 +| pr0nscope  | mit100x    |     | 400                   | MU800   | 71        | FIXME: correct NA?  |
  
 +
 +====== Die archive ======
 +
 +Chips that were decapped for imaging, but stalled out for one reason or another
 +
 +Includes
 +  * Konami 054539
 +    * Embargoed image data to be released 2022-12-13
 +  * Konami 053246
 +  * Konami 053247
  
 ====== References ====== ====== References ======
mcmaster/start.1616571887.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/03/24 07:44 by mcmaster