This is an old revision of the document!


In order to make sure we're all on the same page, here are a few conventions to follow.

Layer name

TLDR:

  • An unprocessed chip has layer “mz” for top metal
  • For others, see below

mcmaster: I've been calling intermediate etchings in more complex processes like s3-7 meaning sample 3, processing step 7. This avoids spending too much time trying to classify something that isn't really a purely poly or active

Conventions:

  • Active/implant/STI layer
    • If bare silicon with no processing: active
    • If Dash etch or similar: stain
  • Polysilicon layer
    • If chip only has one poly layer: poly
    • If chip has more than one poly layer: polyN, where N starts from 1 at the lowest layer and counts up
  • Metal layer
    • If the number of layers in the chip is known (from a cross section, etc): mN, where N starts from 1 at the lowest layer and counts up
    • If the number of layers is not known: mN, where N starts from the letter z at the upper layer and counts down

Image

High resolution images should be named like: <vendor>_<id>_<layer>_<image type>.jpg

Required fields: vendor, id. Add the others if you have them

Spaces are not allowed. Fields should not have _'s. Translate these to -'s if needed

Some sample image names:

  • st_24c02_mz_ns50xu.jpg: ST Microelectronics (vendor) 24C02 (chip id). Top metal (mz) image taken with NeoSPlan 50x objective
  • st_24c02_mz.jpg: Like above, but capture information unknown. It appears to be top metal, so this is added in

Technique

Abbreviated names for different microscope configurations

Applies Abbreviation Name Notes
OM bf Brightfield Usually omitted / implied default
EM bs Backscatter
OM df Darkfield
OM dic Differential interference contrast
EM se Secondary electron
OM xpol Crossed polarizers

Where:

  • EM: electron microscopy (SEM)
  • OM: optical microscopy

Optical

If you've calibrated your microscope against a standard of some sort, please add an overlay with the objective name and a scale bar to your images. (Contact azonenberg if you'd like the GIMP files for our standard overlay, which you can modify for your setup.)

Objective

Please add new objectives to this list as necessary.

NOTE: Imaging typically involves a 10x relay lens to make actual magnification times 10. For example, a Mit20x objective is used with a 10x relay lens to make the final image at 200x magnification on the CCD. However, chip pages should include scale bars whenever possible as sensor size has no relation to pixel size, especially in stitched or downsampled images.

  • am4x: AmScope 4x
  • am10x: AmScope 10x
  • am40x: AmScope 40x
  • am100x: AmScope 100x (oil immersion)
  • bli20x: Bausch & Lomb industrial 20x (designed for stereozoom series)
  • ch2x: cheap supposedly Apo 2x objective that may be made of soda glass (green tinge…). Loosely resembles Seiwa objectives
  • mit5x: Mitutoyo M Plan Apo 5x
  • mit10x: Mitutoyo M Plan Apo 10x
  • mit20x: Mitutoyo M Plan Apo 20x
  • mit50xn: Mitutoyo M Plan Apo 50x Near UV
  • mit100x: Mitutoyo M Plan Apo 100x
  • neo5x: Olympus Neo 5x
  • nd5x: Olympus Neo DPlan 5x
  • ns50x: Olympus Neo SPlan 50x
  • ns50xu: Olympus Neo SPlan 50x ultra-long working distance (ULWD)
  • sz or zoom: Zoom microscope, generally no scale bar provided because magnification varies (unless that particular zoom setting was calibrated during the same imaging session)

Scales

Scope Objective NA JM qty Resolving power (nm) nm / pix Notes
pr0nscope mit2x 5000 3330 Config file. X: 1632 pix
pr0nscope mit5x 2000 1330
pr0nscope mit10x 1000 667
pr0nscope mit20x 700 333
pr0nscope ns50xu
pr0nscope mit50xn 700 133 Assumed linear but needs actual verification. Also hmm should rethink its use
pr0nscope mit50x Proposed, don't have one
pr0nscope mit100x 400 66.7 FIXME: correct NA?

See also

SEM

azonenberg's new standard is: foo_01_type_20kV_10kx_9mm.jpg

“type” may be “se” for secondary electron or “bse” for backscatter.

Magnification should be abbreviated if a multiple of 1000, otherwise written out in full (ex: 3900x, 4kx).

Working distance and accelerating voltage should also be specified to aid in interpretation of the image. Typically for high-resolution images one will use the lowest probe current and smallest aperture that give a good signal-to-noise ratio, so this information is often omitted from the filename.

 
conventions.1520992395.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/03/14 01:53 by mcmaster
 
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution 4.0 International
Recent changes RSS feed Donate Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki