decap:ceramic_glass
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
decap:ceramic_glass [2012/01/29 00:10] – mcmaster | decap:ceramic_glass [2016/12/03 20:50] (current) – removed mcmaster | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Introduction ====== | ||
- | |||
- | I (JM) would recommend thermal fracture if you are comfortable with a torch. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====== Thermal fracture ====== | ||
- | |||
- | Procedure | ||
- | - Place package on a temperature resistant surface | ||
- | - Heat package with a propane torch until hot, maybe 5 or 10 seconds | ||
- | - Gently splash or sprinkle water on the package. | ||
- | - Shear the package open by applying light force. | ||
- | |||
- | Tips: | ||
- | * Chip does not have to be heated until red or white hot. Heating this high increases risk to damage the die from glass reflowing as well as general thermal stress | ||
- | * Do not throw the chip into liquid or move it all while it is hot. This can cause the glass to shift and get onto the die | ||
- | * PDIPs should be supported (ie with a block of metal) as the leadframe will become very weak | ||
- | * If it does not shear open the first time try again. | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Media ===== | ||
- | |||
- | Chip before: | ||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Advantages: | ||
- | * Can be very clean and low risk | ||
- | |||
- | Disadvantages: | ||
- | * Thermal shock can potentially also break die | ||
- | * High temperatures can warp die | ||
- | * The die is exposed but still in the package | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====== Thermal | ||
- | |||
- | Advantages | ||
- | * Can completely remove a die | ||
- | |||
- | Disadvantages | ||
- | * Removed dies still may have an uneven bottom. | ||
- | |||
- | ====== Shearing ====== | ||
- | |||
- | The glass tends to be much weaker than the ceramic. | ||
- | |||
- | Procedure | ||
- | - Place bottom half of package into vice. It may be desirable to put a metal space in between the pins to keep pressure more even | ||
- | - Firmly hold the top of the chip and twist. | ||
- | |||
- | Ideally this would probably be done using a custom fixture to hold the top and apply even and straight force | ||
- | |||
- | Tips | ||
- | * Plumbing wrenches work well to hold the chip as their width can be adjusted for even pressure while still holding it tightly | ||
- | * Be careful with long CERDIPs that you don't apply too much torque on an end and snap the chip in half instead of shear it | ||
- | Advantages | ||
- | * Very readily available materials | ||
- | * Does not use any consumables | ||
- | Disadvantages | ||
- | * Throws debris onto die | ||
- | * Can be difficult to effectively grip top half | ||
- | * Can be difficult to tell how much force is required | ||
- | * Unpredictable how it will shear | ||
- | |||
- | ====== Manufacturing ====== | ||
- | |||
- | Might provide some hints if we knew how these were produced | ||
- | |||
decap/ceramic_glass.1327795808.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/10/20 14:59 (external edit)