decap:epoxy
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
decap:epoxy [2023/09/04 07:42] – mcmaster | decap:epoxy [2023/09/04 07:42] (current) – mcmaster | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
====== Laser ====== | ====== Laser ====== | ||
- | TLDR: bulk material for standard packages can be removed using a fiber laser. However, a CO2 laser will not work (lower peak power => melts silica instead of ablating it). However the laser will damage the die surface if you try to go all the way to the surface (without using a special setup like FALIT). Finally, COB epoxy appears to be workable even with a CO2 laser | + | [[decap:laser]] |
- | General results | ||
- | * Some settings work decent | ||
- | * Possibly COB epoxy is easier to laser than package epoxy | ||
- | * Risk of melting bond wires and/or die | ||
- | * Use lower power and/or pulsed? | ||
- | * Practice on samples before trying something you care about | ||
- | * Puts off nasty fumes. Make sure to have good ventilation | ||
- | |||
- | From Sam Wagner: | ||
- | * "We use a yterrbium fiberlaser. What you are doing is trying to cause the plastic compound to explosively eject the silicon beads. So a pulsed laser is critical. | ||
- | * " | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== jamiecraig ===== | ||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | Above: laser decap from below ([[https:// | ||
- | |||
- | https:// | ||
- | * Seemed to work okay | ||
- | * What would it look like if touched up with WFNA? | ||
- | |||
- | ===== EMSL 6502 test ===== | ||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | Above: poor results. Maybe from CO2 laser (source: photo by mcmaster from EMSL test) | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Silicon Exposed ===== | ||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | Above: [[http:// | ||
- | |||
- | http:// | ||
- | * Poor results | ||
- | * Cranberry glass | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Laser Decap Pro ===== | ||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | https:// | ||
- | * Gold backing block | ||
- | * Good leadframe exposure | ||
- | * Die unclear how well exposed | ||
- | * Scanned entire chip (including die area) up until the end | ||
- | * Raster scan is horizontal, vertical, and diagonal | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Sesame 1000 ===== | ||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | https:// | ||
- | * Cavity into pic | ||
- | * Gives a close up at the end | ||
- | |||
- | ===== CLC ControlLaser FALIT ===== | ||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | {{: | ||
- | {{: | ||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | https:// | ||
- | * Laser Decapsulation FALIT System Software | Image Templates | ||
- | * Pro system demo | ||
- | * Has nice features like overlaying x-ray, CSAM, or other guiding image | ||
- | * Laser scan was horizontal, vertical mix | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Light Ray ===== | ||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | https:// | ||
- | * They do the whole chip but avoid die area | ||
- | * Light Ray - IC Decapsulation | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== mcmaster ezlaze ===== | ||
- | |||
- | TODO: add pictures, estimate material removal rate | ||
- | |||
- | Basically this was too slow to be practical except for very small samples. That said, it did work very well. A quicklase or other higher throughput Nd:YAG system would likely work well | ||
====== Sandblast ====== | ====== Sandblast ====== |
decap/epoxy.txt · Last modified: 2023/09/04 07:42 by mcmaster