decap:epoxy
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
decap:epoxy [2019/05/13 21:00] – [Light Ray] mcmaster | decap:epoxy [2023/09/04 07:42] (current) – mcmaster | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
One problem from this lack of circulation is that it may create pockets of low concentration acid, leading to corrosion. | One problem from this lack of circulation is that it may create pockets of low concentration acid, leading to corrosion. | ||
+ | ===== McMaster live 2019-11-10 ===== | ||
- | ====== Live analysis considerations ====== | + | {{: |
- | Commercial " | + | Experiments trying |
- | Sulphuric acid may be added to nitric acid to help preserve copper, if present (see the acid page for details). | + | |
- | ====== Laser ====== | + | TLDR best result |
+ | - Cut a polypropylene tube (ie from a microfuge tube) roughly the size you want to expose to acid | ||
+ | - Heat tube up to soften it | ||
+ | - Warm PCB | ||
+ | - Attach hot tube to PCB, letting plastic deform into place | ||
+ | - Let cool a little | ||
+ | - Seal outside of tube with silicone | ||
+ | - Let silicone cure | ||
+ | - Decap with gentle heat on hotplate (maybe 160F max) using 2 WFNA : 1 H2SO4 | ||
- | General results | + | Above is a compromise between PP providing the best chemical resistance |
- | * Some settings work decent | + | |
- | * Possibly COB epoxy is easier to laser than package epoxy | + | |
- | * Risk of melting bond wires and/or die | + | |
- | * Use lower power and/or pulsed? | + | |
- | * Practice on samples before trying something you care about | + | |
- | * Puts off nasty fumes. Make sure to have good ventilation | + | |
- | From Sam Wagner: | + | {{:mcmaster: |
- | * "We use a yterrbium fiberlaser. What you are doing is trying to cause the plastic compound to explosively eject the silicon beads. So a pulsed laser is critical. | + | |
- | * " | + | |
+ | Above: hardened silicone bubbles on WFNA surface | ||
- | ===== jamiecraig ===== | + | Silicone only experiment |
+ | * Made silicon dam by layering up | ||
+ | * Silicone surface cured, but internally didn't always | ||
+ | * Uncured silicone dissolved in WFNA and floated to top. This then cured and blocked the surface | ||
+ | * Interesting, | ||
+ | * Acid may eventually undermine the PCB, but eating the silicone itself came first | ||
+ | * Consider using a lot more silicone than you need to help mitigate acid splashes | ||
+ | * Maybe cover board surface with kapton? | ||
- | {{: | + | Someone also suggested I should try PTFE gasket. In the past I had tried kapton which didn't work well (acid tended to wick into kapton). Maybe PTFE would repel acid better |
- | Above: laser decap from below ([[https://www.jamiecraig.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/ | + | Reference: https://twitter.com/johndmcmaster/status/1193807272171827200 |
- | https:// | + | ====== Live analysis considerations ====== |
- | * Seemed to work okay | + | |
- | * What would it look like if touched up with WFNA? | + | |
- | ===== EMSL 6502 test ===== | + | Commercial " |
+ | Sulphuric acid may be added to nitric acid to help preserve copper, if present (see the acid page for details). | ||
- | {{: | ||
- | Above: poor results. Maybe from CO2 laser (source: photo by mcmaster from EMSL test) | + | ====== Laser ====== |
- | + | ||
- | ===== Silicon Exposed ===== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Above: [[http:// | + | |
- | + | ||
- | http:// | + | |
- | * Poor results | + | |
- | * Cranberry glass | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ===== Laser Decap Pro ===== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | https:// | + | |
- | * Gold backing block | + | |
- | * Good leadframe exposure | + | |
- | * Die unclear how well exposed | + | |
- | * Scanned entire chip (including die area) up until the end | + | |
- | * Raster scan is horizontal, vertical, and diagonal | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ===== Sesame 1000 ===== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | https:// | + | |
- | * Cavity into pic | + | |
- | * Gives a close up at the end | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ===== CLC ControlLaser FALIT ===== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | {{: | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | https:// | + | |
- | * Laser Decapsulation FALIT System Software | Image Templates | + | |
- | * Pro system demo | + | |
- | * Has nice features like overlaying x-ray, CSAM, or other guiding image | + | |
- | * Laser scan was horizontal, vertical mix | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ===== Light Ray ===== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | {{: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | https:// | + | |
- | * They do the whole chip but avoid die area | + | |
- | * Light Ray - IC Decapsulation | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | ===== mcmaster ezlaze | + | |
- | TODO: add pictures, estimate material removal rate | + | [[decap:laser]] |
- | Basically this was too slow to be practical except for very small samples. That said, it did work very well. A quicklase or other higher throughput Nd:YAG system would likely work well | ||
====== Sandblast ====== | ====== Sandblast ====== |
decap/epoxy.1557781253.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/05/13 21:00 by mcmaster