User Tools

Site Tools


delayer:abrasive

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
delayer:abrasive [2012/02/21 01:48] – created mcmasterdelayer:abrasive [2013/10/20 14:59] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Lapping ======  
- 
-Used by some professional shops (Flylogic claims to use it as well as wet etching). 
-    *Procedure** 
-  * Apply very fine abrasive (optical polishing compound, <100nm grit is ideal) to turntable of some sort 
-  * Gently press die against turntable, checking periodically if layer is fully removed 
-    *Advantages** 
-  * Safe 
-  * Very flat surface 
-  * Moderate cost 
-    *Disadvantages** 
-  * Requires precision abrasives which may be expensive 
-  * Labor intensive 
- 
 ====== Sanding ======  ====== Sanding ====== 
  
-    *Procedure**+Procedure
   * Secure (glue) die to surface   * Secure (glue) die to surface
   * Use fine sandpaper (1200+?) to remove a layer   * Use fine sandpaper (1200+?) to remove a layer
   * Using polishing paste, Dremel polish layer to photographic quality   * Using polishing paste, Dremel polish layer to photographic quality
-    *Advantages**+ 
 +Advantages
   * Materials readily available   * Materials readily available
   * Safe (for user)   * Safe (for user)
   * Low cost   * Low cost
-    *Disadvantages**+ 
 +Disadvantages
   * May not be as repeatable as chemical etching   * May not be as repeatable as chemical etching
   * Labor intensive   * Labor intensive
   * Risky, easy to grind too far   * Risky, easy to grind too far
-    *Notes**+ 
 +Notes
   * Nohl used Dremel + sandpaper for his MiFare Classic attacks according to CCC talk   * Nohl used Dremel + sandpaper for his MiFare Classic attacks according to CCC talk
  
  
delayer/abrasive.1329788903.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/10/20 14:59 (external edit)