microscope:sem:coating
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
microscope:sem:coating [2013/07/11 05:30] – [Sputtering] mcmaster | microscope:sem:coating [Unknown date] (current) – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Ways to deposit material: | ||
- | * Physical vapor deposition (PVD) | ||
- | * Sputtering: electric field rips ion off of sacrificial electrode (" | ||
- | * Evaporation: | ||
- | * Chemical vapor deposition (CVD): generally not used for SEM sample prep? | ||
- | |||
- | This article focuses on PVD. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====== Sputtering ====== | ||
- | |||
- | "The most common arrangement for a D.C. (Direct Current) sputter coater is to make the negative cathode the target material to be sputtered typically gold, platinium or with high vacuum sputter coaters, metals such as chromium and iridium)" | ||
- | |||
- | Sputtering should be done in pure argon, not air. " | ||
- | |||
- | " | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Sample machine spec ===== | ||
- | |||
- | "For a typical modern magnetron sputter coater" | ||
- | * Vacuum: 8 x l0-2 to 2 x l0-2 mbar (60 mTorr to 15 mTorr) | ||
- | * Sputtering Voltage: 100V to 3Kv | ||
- | * Current: 0 to 50mA | ||
- | * Deposition: 0 to 25 nm/min | ||
- | * Grain Size: < 5 nm | ||
- | * Temperature Rise: < 10°C | ||
- | |||
- | ====== Evaporation ====== | ||
- | |||
- | Material is typically evaporated in either a " | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Boat ===== | ||
- | |||
- | A boat is basically a strip of conductive material with an indentation in the center to hold the material to be evaporated. | ||
- | |||
- | Sample is typically mounted upside-down above the boat so that it deposits evenly. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Filament ===== | ||
- | |||
- | Filaments are similar except that the material is placed inside a spiral. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====== Coating material ====== | ||
- | |||
- | Factors in choosing a coating material: | ||
- | * What type of detector are you going to use? Secondary emission and other properties vary from material to material | ||
- | * Do you have equipment to sufficiently heat it? | ||
- | * Do you have equipment to achieve the necessary vacuum? | ||
- | * Does it need to be removed? | ||
- | * Will depositing it alter the sample? | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Platinum ===== | ||
- | |||
- | Good coating material but difficult to remove. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Carbon ===== | ||
- | |||
- | Reasonable coating material that is easy to remove. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Titanium ===== | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Copper ===== | ||
- | |||
- | Could possibly work? People sputter Cu without too much trouble in medium vacuum (10E-6 torr) | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Tungsten ===== | ||
- | |||
- | Might work but generally not used because its difficult to find something to evaporate it from | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Aluminum ===== | ||
- | |||
- | Probably not usable due to rapid surface oxidation | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Chrome ===== | ||
- | |||
- | Less BSE than other materials but must be stored under vacuum to avoid corrosion and requires high vacuum to sputter [Principles] | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Iridium ===== | ||
- | |||
- | Requires high vacuum to sputter [Principles] | ||
- | |||
- | ====== References ====== | ||
- | |||
- | Sputter Coater Principles (" | ||
microscope/sem/coating.1373520654.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/10/20 14:59 (external edit)