microscope:start
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
microscope:start [2017/11/18 22:15] – mcmaster | microscope:start [2018/12/26 13:07] (current) – mcmaster | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | See also: http:// | ||
+ | |||
Since microscopes are a critical instrument this section provides information on both microscope techniques and equipment. | Since microscopes are a critical instrument this section provides information on both microscope techniques and equipment. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[: | ||
====== General reccomendations (optical) ====== | ====== General reccomendations (optical) ====== | ||
Line 40: | Line 44: | ||
Some non-CNC microscope chassis may be easier to mod for CNC control. For example, the Olympus BHMJ is a boom mount, which can be easy to re-mount with a stage. | Some non-CNC microscope chassis may be easier to mod for CNC control. For example, the Olympus BHMJ is a boom mount, which can be easy to re-mount with a stage. | ||
+ | ===== Camera ===== | ||
- | ====== McMaster reference system | + | Things to consider: |
+ | * What resolution do you need? Likely your lowest magnitude objective will drive this | ||
+ | * Consider how camera RGB pattern will effect resolution | ||
+ | * I use 4x resolution to compensate | ||
+ | * How many bits do you need? Most cameras are 8 bit, but 12 or 16 bit will provide better dynamic range | ||
+ | * Do you have low light requirements? | ||
+ | |||
+ | For Linux software, as of Nov 2017, I believe the MU800 is the only camera with V4L support in Linux (also noting there are MU300 and MD1900 drivers not in mainline). AmScope/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Some people elect to use DSLRs. You can control these using gPhoto2 or similar solutions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== McMaster reference system ===== | ||
My standard system is something like: | My standard system is something like: | ||
* Olympus BH2 core w/ BH2-UMA | * Olympus BH2 core w/ BH2-UMA | ||
+ | * Chassis | ||
+ | * Don't have a consistent option here | ||
+ | * Post mounted (ex: BH2 BHMJ) is easy to use | ||
+ | * The large frame used on pr0nscope is relatively popular, but I don't know model number | ||
* Surplus linear stages | * Surplus linear stages | ||
* Retrofitted with MDrive17 integrated driver stepper motors | * Retrofitted with MDrive17 integrated driver stepper motors | ||
+ | * Machined mounts | ||
+ | * Mirror mount for leveling | ||
+ | * Full size: large mount (ex: Newport NRC 39) rightside up | ||
+ | * Small / low cost: small mount (ex: Newport MM2) upside down | ||
* Machinekit on beagle bone black (BBB) as CNC controller | * Machinekit on beagle bone black (BBB) as CNC controller | ||
+ | * Usually with an Adafruit 572 (Proto Cape Kit for BeagleBone & Beagle Bone Black) for connectors and/or level translation | ||
* Thinkpad T61p controlling the microscope | * Thinkpad T61p controlling the microscope | ||
* MU800 microscope camera | * MU800 microscope camera | ||
Line 53: | Line 79: | ||
* For direct RGB control | * For direct RGB control | ||
* pr0ntools (libpano core) for image stitching | * pr0ntools (libpano core) for image stitching | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
====== SEM ====== | ====== SEM ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | TLDR: | ||
+ | * Good entry level option (~30 nm): RJ Lee PSEM | ||
+ | * Good entry level option (~7 - 30 nm): a recently maintained ISI SEM | ||
+ | * Modern higher resolution (< 10 nm): expect to pay at least 7k (as of 2017) | ||
A good entry level SEM is the RJ Lee PSEM. They are relatively compact and list for about $2-3k on eBay. For example, my PSEM cost about $2000, including shipping, to get operational. However, the instrument is relatively limited, providing an estimated resolution of only about 30 nm. The Super IIIA, for comparison, has a resolution of about 7 nm. This means a hit of about 18x as much information with a 2D image. | A good entry level SEM is the RJ Lee PSEM. They are relatively compact and list for about $2-3k on eBay. For example, my PSEM cost about $2000, including shipping, to get operational. However, the instrument is relatively limited, providing an estimated resolution of only about 30 nm. The Super IIIA, for comparison, has a resolution of about 7 nm. This means a hit of about 18x as much information with a 2D image. | ||
Line 85: | Line 118: | ||
Follow the [[http:// | Follow the [[http:// | ||
- | ====== Field Stop (FS) and Aperature Stop (FS) ====== | ||
- | |||
- | Properly adjusted can give a real improvement in image quality. | ||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | Adjusted (Mit20x objejective): | ||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====== DIY non-optical ====== | ||
- | |||
- | * [[http:// | ||
- | * [[http:// | ||
- | * http:// | ||
microscope/start.1511043312.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/11/18 22:15 by mcmaster