mcmaster:cleaning_enc28
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| mcmaster:cleaning_enc28 [2012/02/20 03:43] – mcmaster | mcmaster:cleaning_enc28 [2025/08/04 21:23] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| {{gallery>: | {{gallery>: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Looks exactly the same after | ||
| + | |||
| + | Conclusion: stuff is still stuck on | ||
| ====== Step 8: acetone lens tissue wipe ====== | ====== Step 8: acetone lens tissue wipe ====== | ||
| Line 70: | Line 74: | ||
| {{gallery>: | {{gallery>: | ||
| - | ====== Step 10: acetone lens tissue wipe ====== | + | ====== Step 11: acetone lens tissue wipe ====== |
| {{gallery>: | {{gallery>: | ||
| Line 83: | Line 87: | ||
| Ultrasound was more effective at removing large particulates than high pressure acetone. | Ultrasound was more effective at removing large particulates than high pressure acetone. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ultrasound does not effectively remove undissolved epoxy but it can be removed by wiping | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tearing lens tissue for smaller allotments is a bad idea as it generated particulates. | ||
mcmaster/cleaning_enc28.1329709426.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/10/20 14:59 (external edit)
